Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
European Respiratory Journal ; 60(Supplement 66):2859, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2291472

RESUMO

Background: Patients with COVID-19 have an increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events during the acute phase. However, the long-term cardiovascular outcomes are unknown. Objective(s): We aimed to determine the long-term effects of COVID-19 in the cardiovascular system. Method(s): This is a multicenter, observational, retrospective registry conducted at 17 centers in Spain and Italy. Consecutive patients older than 18 years who underwent a real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV2 in the participating institutions were included. Patients were classified into two groups, according to the results of the RT-PCR: COVID-19 positive or negative. The primary outcome was cardiovascular (CV) death at 1-year. The secondary outcomes included acute myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, pulmonary embolism, and serious cardiac arrhythmias at 1-year. Outcomes were compared between the two groups. An independent clinical event committee adjudicated events. Result(s): A total of 4427 patients were included, 3578 (80.8%) patients with COVID-19 and 849 (19.2%) without COVID-19. COVID-19 patients were older, had a higher rate of classical cardiovascular risk factors, except for active smoking, and had fewer comorbidities. At a median time of 13.5 (IQR 11.8-15.8) months, after an adjustment by baseline characteristics, there was no difference in CV death (1.4% vs. 1.1%;HR 1.03 [0.49-2.18];p=0.941) between patients with COVID-19 and without. However, COVID- 19 patients experienced higher rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) (3.9% vs. 0.6%, HR 6.11 [2.46-15.16];p=0.001), major bleeding (2.9% vs. 0.5%, HR 5.38 [1.95-14.84];p=0.001), and serious cardiac arrhythmias (2.6% vs. 0.9%, HR 2.25 [1.07-4.73];p=0.033). During follow-up, between discharge and end of follow-up, COVID-19 patients did not experience a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes (composite of CV death, any MI, ischemic stroke, systemic arterial thrombosis, VTE, heart failure hospitalization, or any serious arrhythmia) compared to patients without (HR 0.80;[0.53-1.21];p=0.298). Conclusion(s): At 1-year follow-up, COVID-19 was not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death but with a higher risk of VTE events, major bleeding, and serious cardiac arrhythmias. COVID-19 was not associated with a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events during follow-up.

2.
Rec-Interventional Cardiology ; 4(3):186-192, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | Web of Science | ID: covidwho-2205346

RESUMO

Introduction and objectives: During the lockdown due to the pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a decrease in the number of admissions due to acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was observed. The objective of our study was to evaluate the impact lockdown had on the incidence, morbidity and mortality, and management of ACS. Methods: A retrospective and multicenter study was conducted including patients admitted due to ACS from February 14 through June 24, 2020. Patients with acute myocardial infarction and coronary arteries without significant lesions were excluded. The following groups were established based on the period of admission: a) 1 month before lockdown;b) during lockdown;and c) 1 month after lockdown. The differences in mortality seen among the 3 groups were evaluated, as well as the temporal differences reported between symptom onset and the first medical contact (FMC). Results: a total of 634 patients were included (group a, 205;group b, 303, and group c, 126). A 41% decrease in the number of admissions due to ACS was observed during the first month of lockdown compared to the previous month, as well as diagnostic delay during this same period (group a, 66 minutes (45-180), group b, 120 minutes (60-240), and group c, 120 minutes (60-240), P =.007). However, a higher mortality rate during confinement was not reported (RR, 1.26;95%CI, 0.53-2.97;P =.60). Conclusions: During lockdown, a remarkable decrease in the number of admissions due to ACS was observed, and although there was an increase in the time elapsed from symptom onset to the FCM in this period in patients with STEMI, the mortality rate was similar in the 3 groups studied.

5.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology ; 76(17):B91, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-887085

RESUMO

Background: The demographics, angiographic findings, and in-hospital outcomes of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) – positive patients undergoing an invasive strategy for suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are not well defined. COVID-19–positive ACS patients may have different etiology and outcomes. Patient presentation times from small sample published data appear longer. Methods: Anonymized data on 234 patients in 81 global centers are presented from this prospective registry for the period March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2020. As of submission date, a further 84 patients have been submitted. All were required to be COVID-19–positive (or have a high index of clinical suspicion, i.e., clinical status plus chest x ray/computed tomography scan findings) and to undergo coronary angiography for suspected ACS. Results: Results are shown in Tables 1–3 and compared with National United Kingdom British Cardiovascular Intervention Society/Myocardial Ischaemia National Audit Project databases of non–COVID-19 ACS patients where available and appropriate. Major findings were: significantly higher proportion of COVID-19–positive patients had hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and renal dysfunction. In the ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) subgroup, symptom-to-door time was >double and door-to-balloon increased by median 20 minutes. Mortality was quadruple and in-patient stay double in this group. Similarly, mortality was significantly higher in non-STEMI COVID-19–positive cohort and in-patient stay also double. The high mortality may be due to the high incidence of cardiogenic shock (13.4% vs. 5%), with its 67% mortality. [Formula presented] Conclusion: These novel data indicate that COVID-19–positive ACS patients present later, have higher incidence of cardiogenic shock, and much higher mortality, which are likely to be inter-related. In-patient stay is prolonged compared to non–COVID-19 ACS. Categories: CORONARY: Acute Coronary Syndromes

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA